Acc to agential realist ontology or rather ethico-onto-epistmlgy “individuals” do not preexist as such but rathr materialize in intra-action
-
-
Show this thread
-
"While Cartesian epistemology is built on the given-ness of a distinction or a Cartesian cut between subject and object, the epistemology >
Show this thread -
< of agential realism goes to a set of prior questions."
#BaradShow this thread -
AR does not start w a set of given/fixed diffc'es but rather makes inquiries into how diffc'es are made & remade, stabilized & destabilized.
Show this thread -
The etymology of dichotomy (from the Greek διχοτομία, a cutting in two) speaks of the genealogical dimension of the very notion of differnc.
Show this thread -
... that is, the fact that differences are made, not found, and that dichotomies derive from particular cuts.
#BaradShow this thread -
"Acc to AR, “responsibility” is not about right response, but rather a matter of inviting, welcoming, & enabling the response of the Other."
Show this thread -
"...these various senses of mattering—ontology, epistemology, and ethics—are not separate/separable considerations."
#BaradShow this thread -
Respnsblty is not a calcltn to be performed. It is a r/n always already integral to the world’s ongoing intra-active becoming & not-becoming
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
at first blush seems to have much in common with the Buddhist concept of sunyata (emptiness)
-
I'm not familiar with that concept but it probably does given that Barad is sympathetic to processual thinking which isn't inconsistent with some branch of Buddhism. Well, that's my desperate attempt to make some connection.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.