thinking from a pov causes that lens to stay static. e.g. if u think in dollars, a rising dollar will be experienced as everything else getting cheaper since a dollar cannot by definition be worth more than itself
Show this thread
-
the trouble with this is that most of the activity has little to do with me. if i step on a lego, the lego was not out to get me even though that’s how the experience is interpreted.
Show this thread
financial understanding requires being able to think in higher level concepts like bonds, gold, equity, real estate, dividend yield, etc… rather than only through the lens of cash even though it all boils down to cash
-
-
world understanding requires being able to think in higher level concepts like male, female, animal, plant, dominant, submissive, race, etc… rather than only through self even though everything observed necessarily involves self in some form
Show this thread -
the desire to simplify the world is anti-bullshit in its INTENT but often oversimplifies to the point that it is destructive e.g. “play the note you read” boils down piano playing and is how computers play sheet music. but it strips out music theory
Show this thread -
“just hoard cash” or “men and women are the same” or “racial and cultural differences don’t matter” are similar attempts at simplification and equalization they destroy the higher level understandings and are actively hostile to the creation of higher level abstractions
Show this thread -
like the piano example, equality is achieved by reducing everyone into an algorithm robotically following instructions. “may i hold your hand. may i kiss you now. i will now engage intimacy protocol”
Show this thread -
many are proud that they think in terms of equity or gold or bitcoin rather than cash the equivalent alternative for thinking from the pov of self is thinking from the pov of the future(child) or god(legacy)
Show this thread -
this is not to day that these are better. abstractions imprison just as much as they free but it might be interesting to ask occasionally “does the denominator make sense for this problem statement?”
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.