the distribution of jobs in a society needs to match the distribution of IQ if the system requires 80% of the people to be 130 plus, then it’s a BAD system
Show this thread
similarly, if a moral system requires 80% of the people to be in the top 2 % of agreeableness then it’s also a BAD system
-
-
u could even say they are immoral systems because they force contortion of a natural distribution into a forced desire of what god “should’ve done instead”
Show this thread -
all systems of morality are rooted in non-acceptance bc the only system of morality that perfectly matches the distribution IS what’s happening/has-happened
Show this thread -
so a brainworm like “metta is the path to highest morality” is a trap that ironically does the opposite bc it implies that those who do not metta are less moral by implying that there is some other higher moral plane to ascend to
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.