e.g. if i have 100 dollars of oranges, no matter how much trade i engage in, i should theoretically only end up with 100 dollars of various things. yet through trading it’s possible to amass a fortune. same for popularity, how does one avoid spending all their time stroking?
-
-
think about how u worked extra hard for some recognition. then compound that upwards multiple layers and you can get a sense for how much energy can be created out of nothing but status interactions
Show this thread -
the clueless (in the gervais sense) try to climb this ladder by contorting their values to the value hierarchy the losers conform but create a parallel value hierarchy for social relationships
Show this thread -
the sociopaths on the other hand set about using this compounding dynamic for themselves. either they subordinate enough colleagues into a lieutenant role to have real political power, or they demonstrate this ability enough that they are promoted into the upper ranks
Show this thread -
(in tech often times this is done not within the company but as ceo of another company looking to be acquihired)
Show this thread -
this is how “will to power” works just as the programming command “open” leverages decades of compressed computer science knowledge via an abstracted function that calls layers and layers of lower level functions, “will to power” utilizes layers and layers of hooman will
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.