the kneejerk anger response is not towards the content but the act of expressing the idea at all because it takes the high ground of offering advice which is felt as obnoxiousness at taking the moral high ground
Show this thread
-
even though many (but definitely not all) in positions of privilege are not blind and ignorant to their privilege. they literally try to help for free by giving advice (which is necessarily hamfisted bc they were born to privilege and don’t have everyone’s perspective)
Show this thread
it’s also not unreasonable for them to try to perpetuate their advantage. it was a gift from their parents after all. to try to equalize this kind of privilege attacks the very idea of making a better future for the children destroy this idea, and NOBODY has a future
-
-
from a religious pov, the stance of hatred for the moral high ground is dangerous because God stands at the highest of moralities. to hate the preacher logically leads to hating God the MOST
Show this thread -
so while the stance of SKEPTICISM is good because it allows for more useful extraction from metaphorical stories and true integration with your own life (as well as protection against numerous “false gods”) the stance of ANGER will just lead u to hell
Show this thread -
everyone, even the privileged have to choose between being happy to be born at all vs being unhappy that they were not born to MORE in that sense... being born to conditions where it is easier to say “this is Enough for me to be Happy” is the greatest privilege of all
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.