after playing around with gpt-3 for a while, imo this analogy is the best way to interact with the tool.https://twitter.com/a_yawning_cat/status/1339826316074348544 …
-
-
so classes of usage like "use it like a chat bot" work by incrementally refining and growing a pointer. it's actually an erroneous model to ascribe it agency when it's more like a knee jerk reaction searching for closure
Show this thread -
with twitter threads, there a sensation of "open" and "closed" just like with stories there is a clear sensation when the story is "finished". (just like a joke "closes" w/ a punchline) the story tapers and there is a sense of finality and closure at a final "point"
Show this thread -
rather than get gpt-3 to actually DO something specific, a better tool might be to find some way to manage these different pointers, cutting off low resonant directions but feeding interesting intermediary results into a main branch
Show this thread -
similar to how the "shape" of a blockchain points in the "direction of god" by requiring hashes to be prefixed with zeroes, this tool would help gradually refine the shape of a initial seed thought by helping to twist and "point" it in the right directionhttps://twitter.com/a_yawning_cat/status/1405674449571962883 …
Show this thread -
e.g. an example is a thread of ideas that you wish there were more of, or one that ended too quickly. or a thought that you can lightly grasp but have trouble cohering it into something more resonant
Show this thread -
it helps explore the feeling of "knowing" that something is "there" and "i'll know it when i see it" and allows u to work it out rather than bump around randomly for it e.g. like growing a random plant until the first flower blooms to see its "final form"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.