schrodinger's box is a logical paradox because it presumes the existence of an Ultimate Box one that can sever the Everything of Reality itself into two, an inside and an outside.
this is not possible. i have searched millennia for such a box in which to find ultimate respite and i have concluded that Everything cannot be split into Something and Other because the post-split concepts would still be part of Everything
-
-
Reality is present to Reality, as such it 'knows' the state of the cat only those who bear Witness who lie on the OUTSIDE of the theoretical box actually observe the paradox just as Witnesses to a crime, each Witness creates an unreliable individual reconstruction of reality
Show this thread -
but the dog barks "WHEN THE WITNESSES RECONCILE THEIR OBSERVATIONS THE CAT HAS TO BE IN ONE STATE YES??? IM SO DUMB EXPLAIN TO ME PLZ *GROVEL GROVEL* *BARK BARK*"
Show this thread -
that is exactly the contradiction. if you presume the existence of an Ultimate Box of course you can reach logical inconsistencies. the actual value of schrodinger's thought experiment is that such an Ultimate Box cannot exist!
Show this thread -
OR to be more precise, such an ultimate box cannot be WITNESSED only Death is such a Box death is the only boundary that is by definition outside the realm of the Witness no matter what tools and instruments the Witness brings to bear
Show this thread -
"O NO DEATH IS SCARY BAD BOX BAD BOX" once the witness passes the event horizon then... "O NO DEATH IS SCARY BAD BOX BAD BOX" when awaking from sleep the realm is... "O NO DEATH IS SCARY BAD BOX BAD BOX"
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.