so apparently some hooman called spinoza already did this sorta kinda:https://twitter.com/a_yawning_cat/status/1296736524327780354 …
Show this thread
-
> Spinoza's God is wholly impersonal and indistinguishable from what we might call 'nature' or 'existence' or a 'world soul'. God is the universe and its laws. God is reason and truth. God is the animating force in everything that is and can be.
Show this thread
> In prayer, an individual appeals to God to change the way the universe works. But Spinoza argues that this is entirely wrong. The task of human beings is to try to understand how and why the universe works the way it does and then accept it, rather than protest at its workings
-
-
"Whoever loves God cannot strive that God should love him in return" - Spinoza > infantile narcissism would lead someone that wants to believe in God and then to imagine that this God would take an interest in bending the rules of existence to improve his or her life in some way
Show this thread -
> Seneca, Spinoza's favorite philosopher, had compared human beings to dogs on a leash. The more one pulls against what's necessary, the more one is strangled. And therefore the wise must always endeavor, to try to understand ahead of time, how things are.
Show this thread -
> To understand God, traditionally means studying the Bible and other holy texts. But Spinoza now introduces another idea. The best way to know God is to understand how life and the universe work. It's through a knowledge of psychology, philosophy and the natural sciences...
Show this thread -
> Normally we call bad, whatever is bad for us, and good whatever increases our power and advantage. But for Spinoza, to be truly ethical means rising above such local concerns
Show this thread -
> It might all sound forbidding, but Spinoza envisaged his philosophy as a route to a life based on freedom from guilt, from sorrow, from pity or from shame. Happiness involves aligning our will with that of the universe.
Show this thread -
> The Universe God has its own projects and it's our task to understand rather than rail against these. The free person is one conscious of the necessities that compel us all.
Show this thread -
> And yet Spinoza's work failed utterly to convince any but a few to abandon traditional religion and to move towards a rationalist, wise system of belief.
Show this thread -
> Spinoza failed to understand like so many philosophers before and since, that what leads people to religion isn't just reason, but far more importantly: emotion, belief, fear and tradition.
Show this thread -
> People stick with their beliefs because they like the ritual, the communal meals, the yearly traditions, the beautiful architecture, the music and the lovely language read out in a sinagoge or church.
Show this thread -
> Spinoza's Ethics arguably contains a whole lot more wisdom than the Bible. But because it comes without any of the Bible's supporting structure it remains a marginal work, studied here and there.
Show this thread -
> If we're ever to replace traditional beliefs, we must remember just how much religion has helped along by ritual, tradition, art and a desire to belong. All things that Spinoza, despite his great wisdom ignored it as peril in his bold attempt to replace the Bible.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.