P=NP is actually a question around love. if you can recognize what is and isn’t love, can you produce it?
-
Show this thread
-
roughly speaking, this is a “God Question” as well. it asks if a hooman can go backwards and figure out the process given a final end state. can hoomans reverse engineer Life and thus actively reverse entropy by becoming God?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
mathematically this is about “one way functions” that allow you easily pass in one direction. is it possible to somehow hack your way backwards? like unstirring a smoothie back into fruit that you can plant and grow.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
that is... the Last Question is simply: is Love a renewable resource?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
if it isn’t, then the fundamental stance towards life should be conservative b/c you need to ration and protect it. if it is, then it’s a allocation/production problem that the free market can solve.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
is there a way to reconcile the idea of entropy and God as infinite love and abundance? there is, this false dichotomy is like the rabbit-duck paradox where preconceived notions get in the way of seeing the actual Thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @_BlackBoxBrain_
not sure i parse what you're saying fully but i like the idea that P=NP only to "god". the specific concepts i was thinking about were (1) love as a binary "yes/no" (2) love as timeless (outside past/future)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
ah ok, makes sense. if “you” always have way more of the Stuff than you can possibly make use of, then even if the Stuff is dwindling over time “you” always have an infinite amount of it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.