P=NP is actually a question around love. if you can recognize what is and isn’t love, can you produce it?
-
Show this thread
-
roughly speaking, this is a “God Question” as well. it asks if a hooman can go backwards and figure out the process given a final end state. can hoomans reverse engineer Life and thus actively reverse entropy by becoming God?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
mathematically this is about “one way functions” that allow you easily pass in one direction. is it possible to somehow hack your way backwards? like unstirring a smoothie back into fruit that you can plant and grow.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
that is... the Last Question is simply: is Love a renewable resource?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
if it isn’t, then the fundamental stance towards life should be conservative b/c you need to ration and protect it. if it is, then it’s a allocation/production problem that the free market can solve.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
is there a way to reconcile the idea of entropy and God as infinite love and abundance? there is, this false dichotomy is like the rabbit-duck paradox where preconceived notions get in the way of seeing the actual Thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @_BlackBoxBrain_
not sure i parse what you're saying fully but i like the idea that P=NP only to "god". the specific concepts i was thinking about were (1) love as a binary "yes/no" (2) love as timeless (outside past/future)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
🐈 Retweeted 🐈
as long as there is Something, that something was preferred to Nothing and so made up of love (a desire for there to Be rather than Not Be)https://twitter.com/a_yawning_cat/status/1323510145469485057?s=20 …
🐈 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.