🐈

as a direction or object of worship, it is feminine. as an individual act of moving through the world as a journey, it is masculine.

this would explain why externalized religions, which create hierarchies of value, tend to worship and protect the sacred feminine. the the point of over-protection where it can be indistinguishable from imprisonment or tyranny.

internalized religions however tend to be masculine. the act of self actualization seeks to see self reflected in the world genetically or culturally or intellectually.

while the trap of the former is dogma and decaying or corrupted hierarchies of value, the trap of the latter is narcissism or worship of the self.

worship of the self is worship of the Thing rather than That Which Contains the Thing. this is phallic worship. the worship of all endeavors that seek to “Fuck” the world into heavenly submission by spreading More of Me.

the Seeker and the Journey are One as the one without the other does not make sense. life is a story of the masculine moving through the feminine yet never attaining it. to rise to this Impossible Task is to willingly crucify yourself by opposing entropy.

all living things are thus masculine in nature even though all Life as the abstract container concept is feminine. any specific living thing has a masculine shard because any specific thing cannot be the Whole.

to put the feminine on a sacred altar is to hold her to an impossible standard by demanding unachievable perfection. it is a cruel expectation expected only by those who have lost The Plot.

the act of Doing Something is only meaningful within a Context. if you lose the Context then you are expecting another Thing to be your Everything. if you try to literally Be Inside Someone then you’re retreating to a womb inside Mother script.

not only is this impossible but the act of trying to do so hurts because it doesn’t fit! “I want to be a Mother but I don’t want to be YOUR Mother.”