The rationalist stance may actually be an impediment to this grokking. Indeed, extreme rationalism can feel stilted. A Hyper Rationalist isn't exactly known for being good at dancing, art, music, or sex. Anything that require flow and feeling for what's "right" in the moment.
-
Show this thread
-
This is because the rationalist stance habitually places the self outside the story as an external observer. (Vice versa, marginalized individuals like shy nerds tend to have an advantage when adopting the rationalist stance)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
While this seems to keep the surface area of the ego small due to a refusal to take a non-neutral perspective by entering a story, it's actually quite large. It's the story of Never Being Part of the Story.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
This story vaccinates against the signal "You are a story!" and so often finds itself stuck within the confines of logical determinism. Within the fully rationalist ego, thinking about things is just as good as actually doing things.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
No one is actually fully rationalist however. One of the main "abstraction leaks" is with their relationships with women. (The rationalist trap is predominantly a masculine trap)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
"Never Being Part of the Story" is a very useful stance to feel superior to all the other stories EXCEPT for this ONE thing. Pick-up artist culture is a logical extension and often can work for a while until it breaks down.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
This is because there are 2 main energies in relationships. They are: "I want you to be part of my story." "I want to be part of your story." If the mechanism of story isn't understood, the vibe will ALWAYS be off or buried under layers of fakeness & performance.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Notice how similar "Self as Story" and "Never Part of the Story" are. They are both nihilistic. But there's a BIG difference.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
🐈 Retweeted 🐈
"Self as Story" is a fundamentally non-serious stance that allows greater resolution, color, and depth in the story told because it can be held more lightly. It turns a historical non-fiction into fantasy.https://twitter.com/a_yawning_cat/status/1349421580552523776 …
🐈 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
🐈 Retweeted 🐈
"Never Part of Story" is a fundamentally serious stance that strips away all potential for noise, human bias, or external influence. There's a competitive desire for "perfection" here as well.https://twitter.com/a_yawning_cat/status/1335917603722674176?s=20 …
🐈 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
So while these two stances SEEM close, they are actually very far apart. Their closeness is similar to how the far left and the far right can resemble each other. (This "Near Enemy" effect is incredibly prevalent in spiritual discourse.)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.