"A common sign of an unhealthy institution is paralysis in decision-making" (A line I just read in this article by Samo Burja http://samoburja.com/heal-thyself/ ) Is this a common sign of an unhealthy individual mind, as well? (forgive the unforgivable "healthy/unhealthy" binary)
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @CurziRose
Both kinds of paralysis look to be loss of storymaking ability. A director that plays god removes this need since the director is the source of the story vs the actors(e.g. in improv) "spirituality" seems to be about removing false gods instead of finding "the" God.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @a_yawning_cat @CurziRose
the "paralysis" is like stage fright since few people want to look like complete idiots in the beginner stage of learning improv but that's a necessary step to getting good at it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @a_yawning_cat
Fascinating-- paralysis of storymaking...the director is creating "the" god, too, when he refuses to let story arise intuitively from the genius/subconscious of his performers-- when he refuses to allow it to be a collaborative and natal act.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CurziRose
the director is more like ego IMO, it's merely *pretending* to be God (the source of all story/meaning). It distances itself from reality/others b/c deep down it knows self as pretentiousness and needs the breathing room to continue the script. (plateaus are life threat to ego!)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @a_yawning_cat
I'm not sure I totally understand what your saying (though I like your parentheses as a standalone statement). The ego might do those things in your second sentence....I also think a director CAN be a servant of the larger unity of the whole, where "leader" is just a role.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurziRose @a_yawning_cat
It just really depends on his attitude, whether or not he's trying to make his role "G-d" rather than let his role be "contributing leader responsible for overall coherence" (where the second role conception includes mostly listening, and the 1st mostly telling)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CurziRose
IMO “Director” works better as a property of the system like “center of gravity” rather than a specific individual/identity. E.g. the “center” of a spinning top is constantly shifting even though it benefits from the “hand of God” that starts the spin.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @a_yawning_cat
This is cool. My original meaning in referencing a director is still important to me, though, partially because of its concreteness in my own experience with "good" and "bad" theatre/film directors. It's nice to have one concrete thing in an analogy across systems.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Haha yea, at a certain point the abstractions tend to leave the realm of the practical ^^;
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.