The "No Excuses" stance has always felt oddly mean. The intent feels a corrupted form of its specific pieces. One being that the victim narrative is unhealthy, and another being that picking up yourself after failure IS the path to success vs making excuses.
-
-
In Robert Pirsig's terminology, it's sth like "Only God can _judge_ dynamic quality. Static quality can be _measured_ without God." OR that's "Good" vs that's an "A+, good job kiddo."
Show this thread -
Why it feels mean is that both God and No Excuses Person are both NOT listening to what "you" have to say. This is virtuous in the God role b/c of the Perfect Mirror effect but corrupted when another PERSON is pretending to be the same quality of mirror.
Show this thread -
What makes this worse is that a judge is formed *only* when an appeal to authority is first sought out. That is, every excuse is someone seeking understanding but b/c of that lack of understanding, the question *cannot* be phrased in a way that doesn't seem like an excuse.
Show this thread -
E.g. imagine if every time your heart had something to say it could only sob it out in a whiny snot filled voice and every time it was judged purely on the medium instead of the message.
Show this thread -
Repeating "Stop crying you weakling" and "Now now, no tears are necessary." both imply the *same* thing. That these tears are an impediment. Yet the first is the source of all pain while the latter is the sink.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.