What “too serious” means then is enforcing rules for a game that no one is playing or seeing a demon or ghost that doesn’t actually exist. “Too serious” I suspect, is always a form of PTSD.
Show this thread
-
It’s somewhat distasteful when manifested within a yang aspect since this indirectness is a yin instrument. It points to lack of balance. Like watching your lead health expert recommend injecting sugar and disinfectant as a cure-all.
Show this thread
It’s snake-like as well. The snake dies because the poison acts too slow. The poison is a kind of slow death revenge. It works as a species level strategy though by instilling a fear of snakes.
-
-
Which means that the indirect poison strategy works only if there’s a large enough and stable enough identity that persists through history. A solitary suicide bomber doesn’t make sense when not attached to a larger ideal.
Show this thread -
People are willing to sacrifice themselves only when their deaths contribute to a larger symbol/ideal/movement. Otherwise kamikaze martyrdom poison that kills after i’m stomped on or eaten doesn’t make sense at the individual level.
Show this thread -
Something something Slytherin vs Gryffindor, Harry could’ve belonged to both.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.