But does “too seriously” actually exist? It seems very difficult to control degrees of seriousness unlike degrees of unseriousness. It’s the “shit, someone died, stop laughing” binary switch flip.
Show this thread
-
Happens a lot with smarter people who can see the 99%. The trolling filters out the “idiots” so that they can find their people. A specific “break down my walls if u really care” strategy.
Show this thread
Even if it’s causing (indirectly) the miscommunication that is leading to conflict that is causing real scars in psyches and real blood on the streets. That’s how desperately connection is desired at times.
-
-
It’s somewhat distasteful when manifested within a yang aspect since this indirectness is a yin instrument. It points to lack of balance. Like watching your lead health expert recommend injecting sugar and disinfectant as a cure-all.
Show this thread -
It’s snake-like as well. The snake dies because the poison acts too slow. The poison is a kind of slow death revenge. It works as a species level strategy though by instilling a fear of snakes.
Show this thread -
Which means that the indirect poison strategy works only if there’s a large enough and stable enough identity that persists through history. A solitary suicide bomber doesn’t make sense when not attached to a larger ideal.
Show this thread -
People are willing to sacrifice themselves only when their deaths contribute to a larger symbol/ideal/movement. Otherwise kamikaze martyrdom poison that kills after i’m stomped on or eaten doesn’t make sense at the individual level.
Show this thread -
Something something Slytherin vs Gryffindor, Harry could’ve belonged to both.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.