🐈

Capital deployment in a Useful or Artistic Way is pretty cool. Batman is difficult to hate for example. A social system is great when it can get capital into the hands of those who can deploy capital effectively and efficiently.

It's when you see that capital being burned in an orgy of excess that you start to polish your gun and your pitchfork.

The thing is, even burning capital is just Someone Trying to Do Their Best. When you have a lot of capital as input you're *expected* to generate a similar output.

If you say "I can juggle 10 balls" and only juggle 3 in your shows, people will want a refund and will stop giving you balls. Excess consumption is just them trying to live up to all the money they have.

It's why we see companies who don't return money or try to stay as small as possible as "virtuous". They accurately tell people how much capital they can currently manage effectively.

Rich kids and all the Suddenly Billionaire Chinese Peasants are just trying to do what's expected of rich people. They're expected to Do Something With All That Stuff.

It's easier to be rich in the U.S. because there's a longer history of wealth and more social scripts to follow. Start a charity or non-profit, name a bridge or a town after yourself, start a war, etc... Without these social scripts the default is to Buy Luxury Goods.

You could make the argument that burning a giant pile of money this way at least allows the money to "pass through". A miserly scrooge who just amasses money is like a constipated asshole, locking up energy and vitality in limbo.