It is the coincidence of these two phenomena which creates elites in any group and makes them so difficult to break.
-
Show this thread
-
In a Structured group, two or more such friendship networks usually compete with each other for formal power.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
**This is often the healthiest situation, as the other members are in a position to arbitrate between the two competitors for power** and thus to make demands on those to whom they give their temporary allegiance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Once the informal patterns are formed they act to maintain themselves, and **one of the most successful tactics of maintenance is to continuously recruit new people who "fit in."** One joins such an elite much the same way one pledges a sorority.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
If perceived as a potential addition, one is "rushed" by the members of the informal structure and eventually either dropped or initiated.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
All of these procedures take time. So if one works full time or has a similar major commitment, it is usually impossible to join simply because there are not enough hours left to go to all the meetings and cultivate the personal relationship necessary to have a voice.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
** ayc's personal thought: Being "busy" is a way of signaling harmlessness. Making up or looking for bullshit-job like work for yourself makes you less of a threat.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
When informal elites are combined with a myth of "structurelessness," there can be no attempt to put limits on the use of power. It becomes capricious
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
The first is that the informal structure of decision-making will be much like a sorority -- one in which **people listen to others because they like them and not because they say significant things.**
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
For those groups which cannot find a local project to which to devote themselves, the mere act of staying together becomes the reason for their staying together. When a group has no specific task, the people in it turn their energies to controlling others in the group.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread
his is not done so much out of a malicious desire to manipulate others (though sometimes it is) as out of a lack of anything better to do with their talents. Able people with time on their hands and a need to justify their coming together put their efforts into personal control.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.