At each level in society, people can roughly point you to "up" or "down" and tell you how to get there. Society becomes a paved road rather than a wild jungle.
Yeah it does have some merit, especially is you add in moral arguments, but it's also kinda weird and untested. Yes yes, factory farming and coal are bad but immediately replace ALL school cafe food with Impossible Meat and Soylent starting tomorrow? r u super sure???
-
-
Plus add in the fact that programmers don't tend to be highly representative of the average human. They might do something crazy like make the world into a giant MMORPG. You'd have to like..follow the direction on ur phone to grind for resources or something stupid like that.
Show this thread -
Money comes in to save the day again (sorta) because such a society does not let Linus Torvalds make huge sweeping decisions that affect entire nations and human communities. Instead decisions go to people like Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk.
Show this thread -
Amazon Prime? Pretty cool. Electric Cars? Pretty cool. "Should these guys continue making decisions for the world?" "Yeah I guess. seems ok to me I don't have a better idea."
Show this thread -
Back to the original invisible mountain thing. So while each small individual human ecosystem can be based on its own value hierarchy they often don't scale. The money-manager value hierarchy(aka Capitalism) is the one that scales best so far based on history.
Show this thread -
The thing they're trying in China is really weird. It's just Capitalism 2.0 but they're calling it Communism 3.0 and yet is also being derided as Authoritarianism 1.0.
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.