Somebody, and by somebody I mean “Not LinkedIn”, should be tracking the expanded cinematic universe of a company’s hiring operation and proactively surfacing candidates based on it.
-
Show this thread
-
Simplest possible example and it kills me that everyone doesn’t just auto-operationalize this: assume you are hiring for some role which is relatively fungible and high-frequency, like e.g. “our basic engineer.” If you interview someone and make an offer, and they turn it down:
1 reply 1 retweet 36 likesShow this thread -
You should put that person on some sort of nurture list for forever, just like your sales team would do because they’re competent at sales, and periodically take a whack at them to touch base about the new adventure and see if they’re happy.
10 replies 2 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
Also given that it literally leaks onto Twitter when performance review season happens at tech companies and at least some people end up quite disappointed, you’d think that would be a great time to renew acquaintances with people who might plausibly wonder what changes to make.
4 replies 1 retweet 49 likesShow this thread
What % of reqs do you think actually want “good” engineers vs say spackling material?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.