It would be good to see some more evidence of the GRU’s fingerprints on this. But given the political value of Burisma as a hack-and-leak target and Russia’s national pastime of penetrating Ukrainian networks, nothing in the world would make more sense.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/us/politics/russian-hackers-burisma-ukraine.html …
-
-
"Moderate confidence" is not the kind of certainty the Times story conveys. But to be fair we don't know what else
@Area1Security, who seems to be the Times' main source on this, might have. (I don't see much more in their report here: https://cdn.area1security.com/reports/Area-1-Security-PhishingBarismaHoldings.pdf?mod=article_inline …)Prikaži ovu nit -
To be clear, I'm not arguing that this *wasn't* GRU. They're by far the most likely suspect. But for a story this politically fraught, the certainty of attribution really, really matters.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.