Poor Yorick

@a_fellow_of

the difference between the lion king and hamlet is that in the lion king the jester is still alive

Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2015.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @a_fellow_of

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @a_fellow_of

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    22. sij

    Working on a project for helping people become wise/mature for my church—particularly college students, but widely applicable as well Collecting threads related to this here

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 4 sata

    ive peaked

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. prije 4 sata

    how much ground could a groundhog hog if a groundhog could hog ground

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The older I get the more I find myself "speaking in parables." Or at least imagining that I would. Not to compare mysef specifically to Christ. Anyone can do it.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. prije 20 sati
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 24 sata

    A fire's prayer of thanks: I thank thee for the wood and air The blackened seething ashes where I smoulder, and the sparks so bright by which I craft a sun of night

    Poništi
  7. prije 22 sata

    this is helpful! Explains a lot of the “image” language, which is also sonship language (we are in the image of both Adam and God)

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    The White Whale swam before him as the monomaniac incarnation of all those malicious agencies which some deep men feel eating in them, till they are left living on with half a heart and half a lung.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    ✴️ which is to say, when men are afraid of women laughing at them, what they’re afraid of is that women will treat them the way other men do

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    One way to think about moods is to see each mood as corresponding to a personality type. Vacillating between them (as opposed to holding one fixedly) means that you take in more information: you "sample" the world from a (diachronically variegated) series of points of view.

    Poništi
  11. 31. sij

    I essentially serve as final arbiter—certain actions are out of bounds, certain outside needs have to be met. But most often when I feel internal conflict it’s easiest for me to let the two parts of me that disagree talk it out—my anger and patience, eg.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    What this stage normally looks like for me is even more complex actually: it’s not just me talking to an emotion, it’s me inviting the other parts of me into the conversation, letting my different drives and desires try to reach consensus

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 31. sij

    It’s this second step (in the process understand-shape-act) that I’m having a hard time putting together tools for The problem is that the shaping stage is doubly complex: rather than a process of listening, you are actively conversing w your emotions Two agents, doubly complex

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    I wrote about Joanna Russ, her quarrel with Ursula K Le Guin, mother issues, and some other things:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 31. sij

    This is sort of my plan for my larger projects; tweet to form ideas, make short toolkits for people to flesh them out, build a class to systematize it, and then see what worked

    Poništi
  16. 31. sij

    The next step seems to be shaping those emotions, responding to them and reframing their underlying perceptions (in dialogue) And then the step of outward action, of deciding what to do and doing it, with your emotions taken into account

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 31. sij

    The metaphor I keep coming back to is that your emotions are like your children: they shouldn't run your house (at least not till they're mature!) but they also shouldn't be abused or locked away. Listening to them is central to shaping them into their best selves

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 31. sij

    It seems like the first step is *understanding*; so I could put together a set of tools that help you understand *what* you're feeling and *why* you're feeling it. The emotion wheel, self-interviewing, some IFS stuff. Main point: begin with seeking understanding

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 31. sij

    I'm working on building out a framework/toolkit for my students for handling emotions right now and am trying to figure out how to frame it; is there an order that you should generally follow in engaging your emotions? It needs to be broad enough to capture different experiences

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 29. sij

    This has made me much more skeptical about earthly power in general. It seems to me that Paul and Jesus do not even think that earthly power *makes you more useful to the kingdom*, which renders a lot of my old thinking obsolete.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 29. sij

    ...One shift that has happened in my thinking since then, though, is that I think I now put more emphasis on the *passing away* nature of earthly power. Jesus and the apostles contrast power against the eternal kingdom (=power structure) that is coming

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·