Oh.... Well yeah, I'm beginning to see you're right :(
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Motivate how, exactly? JS still has mutable objects by default. Cc'ing
@sebmarkbage (BTW, I saw the post linked upthread, no need to repost) -
I guess the web itself would be a good motivation for browser vendors in couple of years if immutability would get wide adoption.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
And that's how you make devs ignore cljs. Articles like this doesn't help.
-
Almost every article on cljs blames js and praises cljs. This never helps to get more people onboard.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I was ready to disagree with this article, but honestly I'm sold on learning cljs now, I'm gonna give it a week and just see how it goes.
-
Awesome. I'm working on a tutorial that I'm trying to make simple and easy for JS devs. Hopefully I will publish it by this weekend
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Maybe, but it needs work not hope alone. Will rally TC39 troops in end of July mtg & report back.
-
Actually I wish JS keep its dynamic nature, features like private field could be handled by TS, there is no need to add it any more
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I said it's on TC39 agenda. Crystal ball not able to see more rn.
-
Would be interesting to see how modern JS engines could adapt immutability in such way that it performs well.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.