Indeed. If the US extends its military presence beyond May 1, there’s a good chance the Taliban will declare the Doha deal null and void, its war against the US will be back on, a nascent and fragile intra-Afghan dialogue will fall apart, and we will be back to square one.https://twitter.com/and_huh_what/status/1361914431387672577 …
-
-
Because it seems the only options I'm seeing proposed are stick to May 1 or restart the war (only to w/draw later w/o a deal)? I'm perplexed by the incoherence of a lot of editorial/expert arguments. There has to be a smarter, less out of touch approach somewhere inside the USG
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I think if there's any path to a middle ground, it would run through stepped-up US regional diplomacy pre-May 1 that builds a critical mass of pressure to try to get the Taliban to soften its stance. But frankly that's a hard sell too.
-
You are both right: ignore the "delusional" "noise", aim for a "middle ground" by May using a negotiated+ "mediated path" via "stepped up"+"creative diplomacy" using "critical mass pressure" on both Afghan sides to "avoid the worse," meaning the quagmire+chaos around the corner.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
The US leave or stay decision will not be determined by TB actions - Reactions alone . At things stand other players like AQ & Daesh will play a role especially when their recruitments and regroupings are at its peak this year in Afghanistan.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.