Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
'When the US tightensits rules of engagement & restrictsairstrikes... civilian casualties tend to go down; when it loosens those restrictions, civilians are injured & killed in greater numbers' Common sense, but anyone who's worked for civilian protection knows...
It often does little to counter arguments about loosening those restrictions. Still, this report is important because adds more evidence to the debate. And because the airstrikes aren't over. It's just the Afghan airforce now executing most of them
'AAF is harming more Afghan civilians than at any time in its history' 'In the first six months of this year, the AAF killed 86 Afghan civilians and injured 103 civilians in airstrikes'
'Between July and the end of September, the Afghan Air Force killed 70 civilians and 90 civilians were injured.' So, almost one a day killed and injured, each. And, to be clear, at least some of this would be avoidable with tighter AAF rules of engagement.
But all of this is difficult to advocate for if the US - or others - refuse to be transparent about how many airstrikes they are actually carrying out (which they stopped disclosing in March)pic.twitter.com/13hBcxg9mE
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
