Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Deeply important report from @CostsOfWar on airstrikes in Afghanistan, showing just how crucial rules of engagement matter in limiting the number of civilians killed or harmed
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2020/Rising%20Civilian%20Death%20Toll%20in%20Afghanistan_Costs%20of%20War_Dec%207%202020.pdf …
'When the US tightensits rules of engagement & restrictsairstrikes... civilian casualties tend to go down; when it loosens those restrictions, civilians are injured & killed in greater numbers' Common sense, but anyone who's worked for civilian protection knows...
It often does little to counter arguments about loosening those restrictions. Still, this report is important because adds more evidence to the debate. And because the airstrikes aren't over. It's just the Afghan airforce now executing most of them
'AAF is harming more Afghan civilians than at any time in its history' 'In the first six months of this year, the AAF killed 86 Afghan civilians and injured 103 civilians in airstrikes'
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
