I mean, there's what I'm forced to write in the methods section...and then what actually went down. In need of some compelling and creative arguments on how to rethink the typical polisci case study whatever paradigm - help?
Näytä tämä ketju
Question for research nerds: looking for pieces that thoughtfully critique academic social science methodology in conflict areas. Any recommendations?
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
It's not out yet but I think this will be good...https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030464325 …
-
Oooooh, this is exactly what I need
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I have a soap box that I get on occasionally about this topic, but sadly I don't think that it counts as a peer reviewed article.
-
ha, same! I need some more credible voices to intersperse what the rant I'm currently writing, which is really how I justify most things...
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Check with
@canmutlu and@MarkBSalter's good on methods and critical security studies. I don't think that any of the contributions include discussions on armed conflict, per se. But the subjects are practical and thematically helpful. Also,@rtapscott is working on this.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Advancing Research on Conflict has some great critical resources:https://advancingconflictresearch.com/resources-1
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
@kieranmitton had a very strong bit in his PhD about human subject research in conflict areas. -
100% (and which I obviously read and reread in drafting my own PhD
) - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.