A 4th pillar for the UN? The rise of counter-terrorism – interesting analysis from @saferworld on how the UN's learnt to coexist with counterterrorism and whether consequent compromises have threatened its ability to uphold the Charter https://www.saferworld.org.uk/resources/publications/1256-a-fourth-pillar-for-the-united-nations-the-rise-of-counter-terrorism …
Quick thread...
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
The report reflects an environment in which, at least according to the researchers, many UN staff have deep misgivings about the UM's direction of travel on counter-terror/extremism – yet feel powerless to change it (That said, I'd have liked to know more on the methodology)
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
They have that while some agencies, funds and programs have kept their distance from C/PVE (OCHA, UNICEF, UNFPA) -- most have ultimately participated in the agenda and implemented some sort of C/PVE programming
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
They outline a fairly damning list of seven issues, from allowing member states to ‘blue-wash’ (!) their abusive, corrupt, exclusionary, discriminatory governmental practices, to failing to manage risk and fueling threat inflation
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
There are solid recs: systemwide learning exercise, systemwide review of terrorism language... Yet I wonder if any of these standard solutions will lead to change. How do you actually effectively firewall this, given the risks described? Can we even walk it back at this point?
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.