A 4th pillar for the UN? The rise of counter-terrorism – interesting analysis from @saferworld on how the UN's learnt to coexist with counterterrorism and whether consequent compromises have threatened its ability to uphold the Charter https://www.saferworld.org.uk/resources/publications/1256-a-fourth-pillar-for-the-united-nations-the-rise-of-counter-terrorism …
Quick thread...
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
The report reflects an environment in which, at least according to the researchers, many UN staff have deep misgivings about the UM's direction of travel on counter-terror/extremism – yet feel powerless to change it (That said, I'd have liked to know more on the methodology)
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
They have that while some agencies, funds and programs have kept their distance from C/PVE (OCHA, UNICEF, UNFPA) -- most have ultimately participated in the agenda and implemented some sort of C/PVE programming
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
They outline a fairly damning list of seven issues, from allowing member states to ‘blue-wash’ (!) their abusive, corrupt, exclusionary, discriminatory governmental practices, to failing to manage risk and fueling threat inflation
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
On armed groups, they talk about a core, long-standing problem (below). This issues transcends CVE. This type of stuff is notoriously difficult to generate “evidence” on that convinces sceptics, but the anecdotal/common sense links are hard to ignorepic.twitter.com/6P6MORI0Pb
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.