Seems the answer is: nope? (This is such poor judgement on their part. Astoundingly, mind-bogglingly, hypocritically so...I just do not understand.) https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/08/united-nations-staff-george-floyd-protests/ …https://twitter.com/RChandran1/status/1270337579225886720 …
-
-
I think the bigger question is less about these regulations (which I'd ultimately put in the "inevitable
@UN bureaucratic muddle" category) and if SG@antonioguterres actually tries to seize this moment to lead global conversation on#BLM. A few thoughts on that [1/4] -
Officials around
@antonioguterres have been thinking about how he harnesses global public movements for a while. They liked how he worked with#ClimateChange movement in 2019 (see@WPReview) and have analysed other protests movements for comparisons. [2/4]https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/28227/will-u-s-china-competition-derail-the-u-n-s-commitment-to-fight-climate-change … - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
That’s from group of independent Special Rapporteurs, with mandates from the Human Rights Council, rather than from
@UNHumanRights itself. In some ways that makes it stronger: SRs have intergovernmental mandates. Yet@mbachelet has herself been forceful: https://twitter.com/mbachelet/status/1267790020687077376?s=21 …https://twitter.com/mbachelet/status/1267790020687077376 … -
Fair point; admittedly I'm always a bit fuzzy on some of these distinctions/Special Procedures more generally But I gotta hand it to them for promoting the heck out of that statement and to
@mbachelet for not mincing words
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
