Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The @WSJ report by @glubold & @nancyayoussef this morning says that's exactly what COA 3 is...
It is just so morally irresponsible to even put that on the table, given what we know about WH decision makingpic.twitter.com/M6g96f67bP
Not to play devil's advocate too irritatingly.... but isn't northeast Syria an example of what happens when Trump is *not* offered the option he has expressed interest in? Do national security planners/advisors have any good choices, with this White House?https://warontherocks.com/2019/10/u-s-officials-ignored-trump-on-syria-and-we-are-all-paying-the-price/ …
Whatever anyone thinks of it (myself included), full withdrawal is a plausible, feasible, & to some with political influence on this WH, desirable option. #DOD wouldn’t be serving the President well if it didn’t put that option—among others—on the table for POTUS’ consideration.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
