Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
The Taliban's own negotiating culture has, I would argue, been poorly understood by those from outside trying to (a) get the Taliban to play ball and (b) engage with the insurgency effectively to get what they want
There's much I don't understand. But one implication is that bc change must be consultative, its often slow AF
Also: they can take an incredibly stubborn, effective, hard line on issues they care about. As @MujMash writes, they've given up precious little in talks so far
Last tweet: @rahmat_amiri and I write about the slow AF part of internal TB consultation and institutional change here https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/pw_153-insurgent_bureaucracy_how_the_taliban_makes_policy.pdf …
Also worth checking out this on TB ideology from @FirstDraftPub https://www.amazon.com/Obedience-Amir-Taliban-Movement-Publishing-ebook/dp/B0183VF0HA …
The Taliban are not free to decide when to stop violence, they have handlers abroad who want to see the Kabul side much weaker before any negotiations start. This time, it will be the same.
With these lies you are going nowhere. Be realistic.
Taliban wants to liberate Afghanistan from American occupation and install an Islamic regime. For that the administration of kabul must be eliminated and to achieve this goal they make no concessions.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
