Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
This and the constant Whatsapping are telling details
@TimorSharan talks here about a networked insurgency w hierarchical control. Might seem contradictory but it's what's enabled the Taliban's unbelievable resilience
Yet keeping the mvmt together requires constant consultationpic.twitter.com/diW7RmLpBd
"A leadership structure that depends on consensus and then strikes with a heavy fist against any who disobey from within" Absolutely right. That balance will be so incredibly essential to understand if/as/when intra-Afghan negotiations move forward.
The Taliban's own negotiating culture has, I would argue, been poorly understood by those from outside trying to (a) get the Taliban to play ball and (b) engage with the insurgency effectively to get what they want
There's much I don't understand. But one implication is that bc change must be consultative, its often slow AF
Also: they can take an incredibly stubborn, effective, hard line on issues they care about. As @MujMash writes, they've given up precious little in talks so far
Last tweet: @rahmat_amiri and I write about the slow AF part of internal TB consultation and institutional change here https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/pw_153-insurgent_bureaucracy_how_the_taliban_makes_policy.pdf …
Also worth checking out this on TB ideology from @FirstDraftPub https://www.amazon.com/Obedience-Amir-Taliban-Movement-Publishing-ebook/dp/B0183VF0HA …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
