Many thanks for those insightful thoughts @Afghan_Policy! I’d like to next ask @a_a_jackson to provide her opening thread. #AFGPanel 13/n
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @JJSchroden ja @Afghan_Policy
#AFGPanel Thanks! Locked down far away from all this and feeling woefully disconnected but caveats aside, here goes... The Taliban continues to expand/consolidate control in rural areas. Not breaking news, but the mechanics of Taliban strategy post-deal are worth exploring1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
#AFGPanel Even w/o announcing a "spring offensive,” Taliban attacks spiked. Particularly attacks on ANSF/checkpts/convoys/etc, in the North/NE/NW as well as South Yet they seem to be mostly refraining from real attempts to take key terrain/district centers1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
#AFGPanel (Side note: Yamgan in Badakshan is an exception, but (a) they held it roughly from 2015 til Sept-ish? ’19 so it's not new ground and (b) it’s fairly marginal geopolitically/militarily speaking. I digress…)1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä -
#AFGPanel IMHO: Taliban's exercising caution, testing what they can get away + the bounds of the deal's "strategic ambiguity." They won’t pursue military objectives at all costs (i.e. if they think they'll risk the deal...which depends on the TB reading US signals correctly
)1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
#AFGPanel Here’s the thing: do the TB really need to "take" much territory militarily right now? If they can completely surround DAC so govt officials cannot leave, even to buy food? If they can plant white TB flags 20 feet from a police checkpoint and get away with it?1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystä -
#AFGPanel And if the Taliban can move fairly freely in the district, without “taking” it? And set up fixed location sharia courts, open to all, on scheduled days of the week? And control land distribution? As@muzhary recently wrote about
https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/reports/economy-development-environment/one-land-two-rules-three-case-studies-on-taleban-sales-of-state-land/ …2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 8 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @a_a_jackson, @JJSchroden ja
#AFGPanel This is what they are doing: investing, consolidating, strengthening -- off the battlefield This creeping control strategy can't be captured in stats or color-coded maps. So it is hard to assess the full dimension of control Taliban have exercise (beyond the cities)1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @a_a_jackson, @JJSchroden ja
#AFGPanel A roughly accurate control might resemble Swiss cheese (roads/DACs surrounded, fuzzy contestation in scores of districts) w a few bastions of consolidated political order (Panshjir, Bamiyan) Yet it wouldnt capture how the Taliban mobilizes governance-as-a-tactic of war1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 7 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @a_a_jackson, @JJSchroden ja
#AFGPanel I'm definitely not saying that Taliban governance is super complex or terribly sophisticated. I'm saying that it matters that they are investing in structures + consistency The more they do that, the tighter their control becomes over (a) their ranks + (b) civilians1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä
#AFGPanel Turning to - as I'd promised - Massoud’s piece on the future govt, there are some strong (if not novel) points
Fiscal deconcentration
Kabul’s resource stranglehold is a longstanding outrage and has crippled SNG...and created an opening for Taliban shadow gov
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @a_a_jackson, @JJSchroden ja
#AFGPanel Massoud loses me when he proposes the Swiss model of governance. But I’m grateful he’s driving a vitally important conversation What kinds of structures do Afghans want, see as feasible, in line with national values? How do different segments of society, people see it?1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @a_a_jackson, @JJSchroden ja
#AFGPanel So often the IAN/future state discourses focus on (a) what the Taliban wants (i.e. an emirate? And if so, what exactly is that?) or (b) defending the current system There's got to be better options. And vigorous debate (among Afghans) is the only way to get there.1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 6 tykkäystä - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.