Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
#AFGPanel Here’s the thing: do the TB really need to "take" much territory militarily right now?
If they can completely surround DAC so govt officials cannot leave, even to buy food?
If they can plant white TB flags 20 feet from a police checkpoint and get away with it?
#AFGPanel And if the Taliban can move fairly freely in the district, without “taking” it?
And set up fixed location sharia courts, open to all, on scheduled days of the week?
And control land distribution? As @muzhary recently wrote about 
https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/en/reports/economy-development-environment/one-land-two-rules-three-case-studies-on-taleban-sales-of-state-land/ …
#AFGPanel This is what they are doing: investing, consolidating, strengthening -- off the battlefield
This creeping control strategy can't be captured in stats or color-coded maps. So it is hard to assess the full dimension of control Taliban have exercise (beyond the cities)
#AFGPanel A roughly accurate control might resemble Swiss cheese (roads/DACs surrounded, fuzzy contestation in scores of districts) w a few bastions of consolidated political order (Panshjir, Bamiyan)
Yet it wouldnt capture how the Taliban mobilizes governance-as-a-tactic of war
The current level of territory control also allows Taliban to exercise a quasi total control on tax in rural areas, even in areas not under their control. 4 instance, they stop contractors impl. infra project on the road to make them pay their tax on the proj located in gvt area
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
is one to which international law applies. Refer to
)
