Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Whoa. There are many things to say about this content-wise, as @MujMash and others point out
But that the Taliban are on the front foot, writing in the NYT, directly addressing western audiences, defending their deal, shows a fairly remarkable shift in Taliban PR and positioninghttps://twitter.com/FatmaFaizi/status/1230455995949776897 …
However much twitter just exploded over this, it was an incredibly strategic move to sell the US-TB deal. Among many diplomats etc I speak with, Haqqani is seen as irreconcilable, likely spoilers, criminals or terrorists-for-hire.
It's a weird caricature that doesn't acknowledge the complexity, historical political savvy, and importance of the group. I mean, raise your hand if you can confidently say you actually understand the multiple faces of what is commonly referred to as the Haqqani network.
Anyway. Placing a NYT op-ed in Siraj's name targets that audience. And makes it just a wee bit harder to lob certain types of attacks at the deal. Those who support the deal and want it to work have gotten a helluva lot more press savvy since Sept.
Well, the West was reluctant to address the main stronghold of Taliban/Haqqanies in Pakistan nd kept appeasing Pakistan since 2001, so there’s nothing wrong for them to set with Haqqanies nd negotiate an end to the West’s failed military nd nation-building adventure in Afg.
Like an episode of Homeland. All of a sudden, the Haqqani network is the voice of peace and reason?
Read his reporting. It is more balanced than literally anyone else's, and more often than not focuses on the toll of the conflict ordinary Afghans - regardless of tribe or ethnicity.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
