Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
C’mon @TIME. Get it together. This piece is curiously sloppy. There are legit concerns but they get buried in conspiracy theories and weird mistakeshttps://time.com/5784103/secret-annexes-backroom-deals-can-zalmay-khalilzad-deliver-afghan-peace-for-trump/ …
I mean, are “Pashtuns” a tribe? I feel like they are an ethnic group with a complex hierarchical tribal structurepic.twitter.com/YaET4bxW4e
The bigger problem sadly is that this piece reduces everything to ethnopolitics. (A) that’s irresponsible and lazy and also boring (B) if you are gonna pull that, maybe you need to get your ethnicities and tribes straight?
Whoa. What even... oh boy. This might win the prize for the laziest, weirdest analysis of why the Taliban may or may not renounce AQ. Because they’re in-laws?!?!?pic.twitter.com/STcAiwki29
Did I miss that momentous moment when the Taliban endorsed women’s rights and human rights? Oh wait. It never happened. Sure, they made qualified statements at Moscow about Islamic rights re women etc. Two words: fact checkerpic.twitter.com/JrTnfekeDy
Oh god. I didn't read it but now I think my head is going to explode. "Pashtun tribe"
So, the Pathans/Pashtun's AREN'T a tribe? So that means the Durrani aren't either? What about the Barakzai, Noorzai, Popalzai, Achekzai, Ishaqzai? All just "Pashtun Ethnicity"...
Yes. The Pashtun's are a tribe, with two main sub-tribes, and numerous sub-sub tribes. Mainly in the south, but throughout Afghanistan, and the ruler of Afghanistan has been a Pashtun for over a century
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
