One of the most common concerns about conducting fieldwork in violent settings is the danger of re-traumatizing someone (e.g. via survey, interviews about harm). Does anyone know of any studies that actually tries to measure this risk? Or the magnitude/duration of the harm done?
-
I looked at this prepping for my PhD ethics board and was surprised. There's not much out there, results vary...but a good deal seems to indicate it might actually do more good than harm to get the chance to speak about trauma with a third party
Which indicates maybe we/IRBs/etc have the wrong angle on some of these concerns, and how to deal with or understand them. Anyway, check out these: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508422.2010.521443 … https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/davidrwilliams/files/2004-ethics_of_research-williams.pdf …
-
-
All of that said, I couldn't find much about war-related contexts in this regard. A lot of it was with survivors of violence in non-war contexts. Curious to see if you find anything on doing this in the context of ongoing violence...
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.