Enough about the harassment stuff I mean. GNU is an operating system for computers / a collection of software. The GNU project being made up of its programmers. FSF is an org creates licenses, promotes them and owns copyrights to a set of software.
-
Both situations are a problem. I also work in the field, and have been involved in (in one case co-founded) FOSS projects.
Well, then you are effectively asking shitty people who are good at code, to go fork the code? Because it's not like you can stop them from writing good code (that others will want to use)?
-
-
We are asking for "shitty people" (your phrase) not to be in leadership positions.
-
Which leads to the forking. Code does not work like organizations. Esp not FOSS code, by design, can not be taken ownership of this way. Yes, you can compete on being better at the code, but that's it. Unless you just want to burn it all down (that's also a possibility I guess).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.