Great prove me wrong, genius
-
-
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
Homie you can’t even prove yourself right on a single thing. You’re still confused on what a platform is and on how they have to operate. If YouTube has defined rules and the rules are followed YouTube can not remove/suppress that creators content.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @amilh and
A platform is a tool for free speech with set guidelines by YouTube. If YouTube doesn’t follow there on set rules and only single out certain creators that not only is merit for a lawsuit but also is not legal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
Right back at ya. So many stupid claim with so many irrelevant sources.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
I backed up every claim I made... You haven't with any claim you've made
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
So haven’t you. Also you provided Section 230 of the CDA but clearly have to understanding of it. This gives the platforms power to remove, suppress, monitor, and etc. But within there terms of service. If they don’t follow there own terms it’s not legal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @amilh and
Prime Example: What happened to facebook.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_samjack_ @TheBottle8 and
Great where in 230 does it say that. Thanks!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amilh @TheBottle8 and
So you want me to show you a part in 230 so then we can argue the interpretation and whether it would apply or not. Let’s be honest you don’t care about that you just want conservative voices censored.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And if you would like interpretation of the court go read up on the Facebook lawsuit concerning CDA 230.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.