This is interesting. I’ve seen the book recommended quite a few times but haven’t read it as it always struck me as a bit of scaremongering 
https://twitter.com/alexeyguzey/status/1195380402078265345 …
-
hi! I'm the author of the essay. I wonder, if you agree that he makes a ton of errors/misrepresentations in the first 10 pages of the book, do you expect that the first chapter is uniquely bad in this respect and that his treatment of facts improves later, and if yes, why?
Hi! Thanks for responding to me! No, I think you’re likely to be right, but assuming that’s the case without actually checking the rest of the book doesn’t seem very scientific to me. I’d love to have the time to do a full debunk but my to read pile is already 8 books high.
-
-
got it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.