You're conflating several different concepts. You can be charged with notice of the contents of a writing that you didn't in fact read, but that's as a convenience and the words are still given an ordinary meaning. You can define words in a contract or patent or statute, but...
-
-
-
... then you'll be "acting as your own lexicographer" only as far as the document goes. And courts in cases do not pronounce on the meanings of words in a vacuum, rather they resolve (with few exceptions) actual cases with actual parties in conflict. And there is a potential for
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Absolutely. Resolving these is an important role of the appeals hierarchy
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
in