Let's unpack. This NYT article claims to examine the controversy around Handke & genocide denial. Titled "Genius, Genocide Denier or Both?", it is written by @alexmarshall81 and @CFSchuetze, with @MattAndersonNYT as the editor of the NYT culture section.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/10/books/peter-handke-nobel-prize.html …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
After noting the storm of arguments around Handke's writings on the Yugoslav Wars & some biographical filler, the journalists state it was that Handke's 1995-96 texts—"Winter Journey" + "Summer Addendum"—that launched the controversy over his relativization of genocide in Bosnia.
Prikaži ovu nit -
But almost half of the actual substance of the article—on the subject of 1990s Wars & genocide denial—is based around quotations & claims of three authors: Scott Abbott, Zarko Radakovic, and Malte Herwig. Who are they? Why are these choices so problematic? What's missing?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Let's look at Scott Abbott, described as "an American translator who accompanied Handke on a visit to Serbia," and Zarko Radakovic, "a friend who has traveled in the region with Handke, and who has translated his work." This is a deeply misleading framing stripped of key context.
Prikaži ovu nit -
In 1990s, it was Scott Abbott & Zarko Radakovic who accompanied Handke *in texts* at the heart of the controversy! Open the intro to "Winter Journey," the text that kicked off the genocide denial controversy. You'll find Handke with Abbott & Radakovic in a buddy road moviepic.twitter.com/hGqAwqr6b8
Prikaži ovu nit -
This alone is a massive blind spot. The article omits (intentionally or unintentionally) key information about the much-quoted Abbott & Radakovic. They are not detached "experts," but literally the fellow travelers in the texts charged with genocide denial. Why omit this?
Prikaži ovu nit -
But it gets much worse. Friends for over 30 years, Abbott & Radakovic even wrote a book together about their shared Handke fandom: it's called "Vampires & A Reasonable Dictionary" (Punctum Books, 2014). Abbott's blogs have many photos from these trips. https://punctumbooks.com/titles/vampires-a-reasonable-dictionary/ …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Abbott & Radakovic's book is full of gems. They describe Handke on another buddy road trip to genocide country in 1998. The gang is back together—Handke & A&R—but this time joined by Thomas Deichmann, a freelancer denialist who claimed the Bosnia concentration camps were lies.pic.twitter.com/wtVALD4fR2
Prikaži ovu nit -
As the first war crime trial began at the Hague in 1996, Thomas Deichmann became an avid "media expert" on behalf of Dusko Tadic, a Serb politician turned camp guard. Tadic was found guilty at the ICTY on charges of crimes against humanity. https://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/trans/en/961030IT.htm …
Prikaži ovu nit -
But Deichmann then entered another losing battle against the facts. In a notorious case, he accused ITN, inc
@edvulliamy, of deliberately fabricating stories & "lies" about the Trnopolje concentration camp. ITN sued LM & Deichmann & won on libel charges.https://www.theguardian.com/media/2000/mar/15/pressandpublishing.tvnews …Prikaži ovu nit -
But Deichmann found friends & fellow-travelers in Handke, Abbott, and Radakovic, the trio at the heart of the NYT article. Here is an excerpt by Abbott & Radakovic in their book repeating Deichmann's claims that can be only described as genocide denialpic.twitter.com/j8F6mQlfS4
Prikaži ovu nit -
These are easily verifiable facts. The focus should be on the NYT journalists & editors,
@alexmarshall81,@CFSchuetze,@MattAndersonNYT. They have serious questions to answer:Prikaži ovu nit -
Did they do background research on genocide denial, as it is a difficult topic? Why did they omit crucial information about the key interviewees in their article? Aside from Handke's fellow travelers, did the NYT journalists reach out to other writers who criticized Handke?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Was Salman Rushdie busy? Or did they not even ask? Or Johannes Anyuru? Or Hari Kunzru? Or John Erik Riley? Or Oyvind Berg? Or Gun-Britt Sundstrom? Or Sindre Bangstad? Or PEN America?https://pen.org/press-release/statement-nobel-prize-for-literature-2019/ …
Prikaži ovu nit -
(Btw I know it'd be too much to ask the NYT culture section to talk to those of us who made it out of the 1990s alive—people like Faruk Sehic, Aida Hozic, Sasha Hemon, Svetlana Slapsak, etc—to NYT we're all too biased by existing—so I'm just going to keep asking questions.)
Prikaži ovu nit -
In a piece on contested pasts, why were no historians interviewed? In a piece on genocide denial, why were no actual experts who research genocide denial interviewed? Is NYT willing to remedy these crucial problems? Willing to ask more searching questions? If not, why not?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Let's recap. In an essay on genocide denial, the NYT journalists chose to uncritically repeat the same worn-out talking points by the very people involved in the denial scandal, omitting key information about them and making no effort to challenge their claims.
Prikaži ovu nit -
As a result, the NYT article on Handke is fundamentally, devastatingly misinformed & dangerously positioned to further spread the unchallenged views of the Handkes, the Deichmanns, and the many fellow travelers of genocide denial in this world.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The absolute least that NYT should do is revise their article — in a profoundly critical way. By publishing this piece, NYT has brushed off genocide denial, a deadly serious and traumatic problem, as an ultimately irrelevant little matter of quaint literary taste.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.