sanketh

@__c1own

recovering theorist. I believe in crypto.

Waterloo, Ontario
Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @__c1own

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @__c1own

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    17. stu 2019.

    Updated preprint: Computations with Greater Quantum Depth Are Strictly More Powerful (Relative to an Oracle) with Matt Coudron.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 3. velj

    I really admire the researchers at and but their top brass seems to making stupid statements like the one above and (). And, at the end of the day, it is these people that do asset allocation, and hence drive the industry.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 3. velj
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. 1. velj

    I think cryptographic fuzzy hashing would be really cool. I wrote down some thoughts here:

    Poništi
  5. 29. sij
    Poništi
  6. 27. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Once we get to PKI there are many other systems we need to think about like revocation: what if you were hacked and you lost your private key? How do you tell the world to not trust the public key anymore? We have solutions like OCSP must-staple but no one implements them.

    Poništi
  7. 26. sij

    I didn't have job applications in mind when I registered the domain ""...

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    So what does an IoT device need? A hardware root of trust should be provided by the device. This should be a unique identifier and a key which is signed by a mutually trusted authority.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 23. sij

    People seem to be taking the encryption statement too seriously. But take a second and look at the context. The CEO also talks about protein folding (which is NP-hard), climate change (duh), and quantum encryption (really, man?).

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    PSA: when linking to papers, provide the link to the abstract (e.g., ), NOT the direct link to the pdf (e.g., ). PDFs are cumbersome on mobile devices, slow to load, and not everyone always has a fast connection.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    This is a good article going into detail as to why open access in ACM is expensive: its used for pay for K-12 education and other programs. I have some problems with the article though. A thread.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    We put together a site to look for applied crypto research. Eprint is great, but wading through 1500 papers/yr for 100 practical papers is 💩. Join us and help out!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 14. sij
    Poništi
  14. 13. sij
    Poništi
  15. 9. sij

    . SIP (), and enforcing least privilege in general, is a great idea. But your current implementation is kinda black-and-white. What about adding a different password (with 2fa) to get the extra privileges?

    Poništi
  16. 6. sij
    Poništi
  17. 1. sij
    Poništi
  18. 29. pro 2019.

    We can try hard to rationalize why some people in our community are offended by this term, or we can take that as an irrelevant factor, respect them (as people), and use a different term. It is wrong to say, I don't see how you can be offended by it, therefore it is okay.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. pro 2019.

    If you're a physics crackpot who wants to publish in a prestigious-sounding journal, I recommend Nature Scientific Reports! You have a good chance of getting your paper in! Try making it look like "Mass–Energy Equivalence Extension onto a Superfluid Quantum Vacuum". (1/n)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 21. pro 2019.

    I wonder if someone could whip up a website like where people can pledge this.

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. pro 2019.

    And as somebody mentioned: forcing academics to pay the something like $2000 for open access doesn't count. That's revenue replacement, not costs. And if anything is firmly against broadening participation and inclusion in CS, one of ACM's stated goals.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·