I was expecting only the finest ad hominems from the systemd developers, but @davidstrauss's are only a 2/10https://twitter.com/DavidStrauss/status/781766766242308096 …
-
-
This idiot works on systemd and doesn't even know how it works. Sad.
-
-
There's no reason systemd needs to be written in a language as low-level as Rust anyway... GC would be perfectly fine.
-
lowlevel isn't the important part about Rust. Rust's main selling points are safety (even with concurrency)
-
It's incredibly constrained by the focus on performance and low-level control. Of course it's important...
-
It would be a much different language otherwise. It has to sacrifice a lot of usability for performance/control.
-
It actually adds a lot of usability too. Options and Results alone, the way traits work,.…
-
Doesn't change the fact that it's a low-level language and memory management is always at the forefront.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For what is worth, I *have* written my own init system (supervision+service manager) and I also say systemd is a pile of trash. :-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.