I did not know about this story. Microsoft's side of this story:https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2018/04/27/the-facts-about-a-recent-counterfeiting-case-brought-by-the-u-s-government/ …
-
-
-
I don't dispute that Lundgren broke the law by distributing software that wasn't his to distribute. But the 15 month sentence was based on the falsehood that the discs were worth $25, when $25 is the license cost, and Lundgren's discs didn't come with a license. (1/3)
-
In fact, the disc contents were literally free to download from Microsoft's website. Had Microsoft been honest about the true cost, Lundgren's sentence would have been substantially less. (2/3)
-
Of course, Microsoft's post doesn't address this. It smears Lundgren in an attempt to distract people from the real issue: an excessive and unjust sentence based on a false figure provided by Microsoft. (3/3)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.