I think maybe the issue is with the paradigm "we". The "Go Team" seems to be responsible for making decisions. That is bad. I think folks (like the ones being bothered with twitter notifications right now) who aren't on the Go team would enjoy some ownership here.
-
-
Replying to @krisnova @carmatrocity and1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @krisnova @carmatrocity and
As someone that has been on both sides, yes. The Go team needs to move their decision making into the open, where not only others can "see" but also participate in the proposal review process. Lots of good intentions, maybe just not enough visible execution so far.
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @francesc @carmatrocity and
I can’t believe I’m saying this: Even
@CloudNativeFdn or the@linuxfoundation seem more OSS/neutral - we use them for Kubernetes - why can’t we have Go governed by a proper* OSS governance foundation?4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
I heard a rumour
@CloudNativeFdn would take on Go as a governed project, if it ever got to that stage... Still the case@cra ?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
a programming language isn’t in scope for CNCF,
@linuxfoundation would happily help find or build the right home for it if that is what the community wanted1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Yes - this is what we want :)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
How do we start this process?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
it is up to the owners of the project to initiate or if there was some RFC process in the community (don’t know go governance) to have an open discussion, we don’t get involved until a decision is made or if people have questions
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Looks like the
@linuxfoundation is open to adopting Go as a community governed project. How would one make a proposal to the Go Team at Google about driving this change?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
