R/ACC merely seems to imply that there exist certain dependencies necessary to sustain the accelerationism process—without necessarily asserting what ends that process 'should' evolve towards. (Said dependencies are not immutable ofc, will flux relative to material capabilities)
-
-
unfortunately i'm gonna have to cut this off before we descend to the second circle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm not sure what you're saying there. time is auto-productive. and so is capital (since it's a time structure).
-
what im saying is that economic growth in fact depends on all of those things
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.