Less a "problem" than a partial definition:https://www.technologyreview.com/s/604087/the-dark-secret-at-the-heart-of-ai …
-
-
Replying to @UF_blog
So there are no theories of deep learning by *definition*?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_Vimothy_
There's no human comprehension of synthetic superintelligence by definition.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @_Vimothy_
Initial suspicion has to be that the distinction between "deep learning" and intelligence is not very robust.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
Replying to @UF_blog
Well it's not true that there's no human comprehension of deep learning networks. For eg, there's a fantastic summary of work done on feature visualisation at the new distil blog herehttps://distill.pub/2017/feature-visualization/ …
0 replies
1 retweet
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.