technomic capital.
-
-
if it actually produces ever more war, i certainly do.
-
is that an important qualification to ur definition, that a process is only intelligent if it produces more of itself *forever*?
-
it can cease to be intelligent, of course.
-
Its an interesting way of looking at intelligence biut to call it idiosyncratic would be an understatement
-
There is nothing idiosyncratic about the notion that intelligence must necessarily transcend what an individual human is capable of
-
is there something idiosyncratic about describing capital as an intelligence? war? a housing bubble?
-
to the extent that those are self-sophisticating processes, which admittedly isn't as readily apparent or necessarily true with bubbles and war as it is with capital, no
-
"self-sophisticating" seems slightly different to the earlier definition. what do you mean by it?
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.